Patenting genes: pros and cons pros can invest in a patented gene genetics generation is committed to providing impartial and clear information that is.
Washington — human genes may not be patented, the supreme court ruled unanimously on thursday or cdna. The guardian - back to home human dna belongs to no one - it shouldn't be patented luigi palombi.
Yes, but only under certain circumstances yes, i think genes should be patented because, if a gene is created for the greater good of our planet.
Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments you can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at the end of the page genes should be patented because while they are studied only after they have been acquired and they cannot be acquired without ownership when genes are owned their.
The supreme court agrees to hear a case deciding if two cancer genes should continue to be protected by patent.
Can genes be patented a gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of dna (a gene) given by a government to the individual, organization.
Patenting of specific human genes constitutes a threat to basic science and should not be allowed, a legal scholar and ethicist said at the law school recently humans “have only 30,000 genes, so the fact that there are now 8,000 of those genes or more that are patented is a significant number.